Haddad v. Indiana Pacers et al

Filing 7

ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Indiana Pacers.(Potter, Steven)

Haddad v. Indiana Pacers et al

Doc. 7

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES HADDAD, Plaintiff, -vsCase No. 04-CV-74932 Hon. ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR

INDIANA PACERS, an assumed name a/k/a PACERS Mag. Judge Donald A. Scheer BASKETBALL CORPORATION, an Indiana corporation, JERMAINE O'NEAL and ANTHONY JOHNSON, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ L.S. CHARFOOS (P11799) Potter, DeAgostino, Campbell & O'Dea JASON J. THOMPSON (P47184) STEVEN M. POTTER (P33344) Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Indiana Pacers 5510 Woodward Avenue 2701 Cambridge Court, Suite 223 Detroit, Michigan 48202 Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 [phone]/FAX [phone]/FAX 0051 THOMAS W. CRANMER (P25252) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN (P48999) Attorneys for Anthony Johnson 150 W. Jefferson, Suite 2500 Detroit, Michigan 48226 [phone] _____________________________________________________________________________ DEFENDANT INDIANA PACERS' ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND RELIANCE UPON JURY DEMAND NOW COMES Defendant, INDIANA PACERS, by and through its attorneys, POTTER, DeAGOSTINO, CAMPBELL & O'DEA, and for its Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint, states as follows: 1. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 1 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 2 of 8

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 2. In response to paragraph 2 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant admit the allegations

contained therein. 3. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 3 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 4. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 4 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 5. In response to paragraph 5 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant admits the

allegations contained therein. 6. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 6 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant denies for the reason they are untrue. 7. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 7 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 8. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 8 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 9. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 9 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief.

2

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 3 of 8

Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 10. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 10 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 11. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 11 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 12. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 12 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 13. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 13 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 14. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 14 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 15. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 15 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 16. In response to paragraph 16 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs.

3

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 4 of 8

17.

In response to paragraph 17 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 18. In response to paragraph 18 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies the allegations contained therein due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 19. In response to paragraph 19 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies the allegations contained therein due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 20. In response to paragraph 20 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies the allegations contained therein due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 21. In response to paragraph 21 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies the allegations contained therein due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 22. In response to paragraph 22 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies the allegations contained therein due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 23. In response to paragraph 23 of Plaintiff's Complaint, Defendant neither admits nor

denies the allegations contained therein due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs.

4

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 5 of 8

COUNT I - ASSAULT AND BATTERY 24. Defendant repeats and realleges Paragraphs 1 through 23 of its Answer as though

more fully set forth herein. 25. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 25 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 26. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 26 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 27. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 27 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. COUNT II - WANTON AND WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 28. Defendant repeats and realleges Paragraphs 1 through 27 of its Answer as though

more fully set forth herein. 29. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 29 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs. 30. In response to the allegations contained in paragraph 30 of Plaintiff's Complaint,

Defendant neither admits nor denies due to lack of information upon which to form a belief. Defendant leaves Plaintiff to his proofs.

5

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 6 of 8

RELIEF SOUGHT 31. Defendant repeats and realleges Paragraphs 1 through 30 of its Answer as though

more fully set forth herein. 32. No answer is required.

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Honorable Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint and award Defendant costs, interest and attorneys' fees so wrongfully incurred. POTTER, DeAGOSTINO, CAMPBELL & O'DEA s/STEVEN M. POTTER (P33344) Attorney for Defendant Indiana Pacers 2701 Cambridge Court, Suite 223 Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 [phone] [e-mail]

Dated: March 15, 2005

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES NOW COMES Defendant, INDIANA PACERS, by and through its attorneys, POTTER, DeAGOSTINO, CAMPBELL & O'DEA, and hereby submits the following as its Affirmative Defenses: 1. That Plaintiff's Complaint is barred because of release, prior judgment, statute of

limitations, statute of frauds, and/or assignment or other disposition of the claim before the commencement of the action. 2. That Plaintiff's injuries and damages, if any, were not caused in whole or in part by

any acts of negligence of Defendant herein, but instead were caused in whole or in part by the

6

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 7 of 8

negligence and/or comparative negligence of Plaintiff. 3. That Plaintiff's injuries and damages, if any, were not caused in whole or in part by

any act of negligence on the part of Defendant, but instead were caused in whole or in part by actions of third-parties over whom this Defendant had no control. 4. That this Defendant relies upon all defenses, limitations and/or set offs provided

under the Michigan Tort Reform Act, Public Act 178, 1986. 5. That non-parties to this action, as set forth pursuant to the identification of any non-

parties at fault (which is incorporated by reference and made a part hereof), were negligent in causing or creating conditions initiating the incident which was a and/or the proximate cause of Plaintiff's claimed damages. 6. That as to this Defendant, this action was filed after March 28, 1996; therefore, all

provisions of Public Act 161 apply to this Defendant together with all provisions of the Tort Reform that have taken effect. By way of illustration, but not limitation, this Defendant cites MCL 600.1629(1), 600.2957(3), 600.6304(3), 600.2960, 600.2947(6), 600.2955, 600.2946(2), 600.2947(5), 600.2946(a), 600.2955(a), 600.2947(4), 600.2945(j), 600.2948(2), 600.2947(1), 600.2945(a), 600.1621, 600.1627, 600.1629, 600.1641, 600.2946, 600.2948, 600.2956, 600.6304, 600.6312, 600.2958, 600.2959, 600.2947, 600.2949(a), 600.2957, 600.6306, and all other provisions that could in any way have any applicability to this matter. 7. granted. 8. 9. That Plaintiff has failed to mitigate his damages. That Defendant reserves the right to amend these Affirmative Defenses as additional That Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a cause of action upon which relief may be

7

Case 2:04-cv-74932-ADT-DAS

Document 7

Filed 03/16/2005

Page 8 of 8

facts become known throughout the course of discovery. POTTER, DeAGOSTINO, CAMPBELL & O'DEA s/STEVEN M. POTTER (P33344) Attorney for Defendant Indiana Pacers 2701 Cambridge Court, Suite 223 Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 [phone] [e-mail] RELIANCE UPON JURY DEMAND NOW COMES Defendant, INDIANA PACERS, by and through its attorneys, POTTER, DeAGOSTINO, CAMPBELL & O'DEA, and hereby relies upon the Demand for Jury filed by Plaintiff in the above-captioned cause of action. POTTER, DeAGOSTINO, CAMPBELL & O'DEA s/STEVEN M. POTTER (P33344) Attorney for Defendant Indiana Pacers 2701 Cambridge Court, Suite 223 Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 [phone] [e-mail]
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 16, 2005, I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: N/A, and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the paper to the following non-ECF participants: L.S. CHARFOOS/JASON J. THOMPSON, 5510 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48202 and THOMAS W. CRANMER/MATTHEW F. LEITMAN, 150 W. Jefferson, Suite 2500, Detroit, Michigan 48226. s/STEVEN M. POTTER (P33344) Attorney for Indiana Pacers 2701 Cambridge Court, Suite 223 Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326 [phone] [e-mail]

Dated: March 15, 2005

Dated: March 15, 2005

8