Szymanski v. Renico
Filing
75
ORDER denying 74 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
EUGENE SZYMANSKI,
Petitioner,
Case Number 05-10241
Honorable David M. Lawson
v.
PAUL RENICO,
Respondent,
________________________________________/
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The petitioner, Eugene Szymanski, presently confined at the Carson City Correctional
Facility in Carson City, Michigan, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254. Presently before the Court is the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment.
Summary judgment is appropriate if “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and
the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Bryson v. Middlefield Volunteer Fire Dept.,
Inc., 656 F.3d 348, 351 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). The summary judgment rule
applies to habeas proceedings. Harris v. Stegall, 157 F.Supp.2d 743, 746 (E.D. Mich. 2001).
However, a federal district court should not enter a summary judgment in a habeas case if the
pleadings or papers present a genuine issue of material fact. United States ex. rel. Johnson v. De
Robertis, 718 F.2d 209, 211 (7th Cir. 1983).
In this case, the petitioner has not demonstrated the absence of a genuine issue of material
fact and therefore has not met the burden for summary judgment. The Court will deny the
petitioner’s motion without prejudice. The Court will review the issues raised by the petitioner in
its consideration of the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment [dkt. #74]
is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
s/David M. Lawson
DAVID M. LAWSON
United States District Judge
Dated: November 22, 2011
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served
upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first
class U.S. mail on November 22, 2011.
s/Deborah R. Tofil
DEBORAH R. TOFIL
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?