Szymanski v. Renico

Filing 75

ORDER denying 74 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge David M. Lawson. (DTof)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EUGENE SZYMANSKI, Petitioner, Case Number 05-10241 Honorable David M. Lawson v. PAUL RENICO, Respondent, ________________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The petitioner, Eugene Szymanski, presently confined at the Carson City Correctional Facility in Carson City, Michigan, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Presently before the Court is the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment. Summary judgment is appropriate if “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Bryson v. Middlefield Volunteer Fire Dept., Inc., 656 F.3d 348, 351 (6th Cir. 2011) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a)). The summary judgment rule applies to habeas proceedings. Harris v. Stegall, 157 F.Supp.2d 743, 746 (E.D. Mich. 2001). However, a federal district court should not enter a summary judgment in a habeas case if the pleadings or papers present a genuine issue of material fact. United States ex. rel. Johnson v. De Robertis, 718 F.2d 209, 211 (7th Cir. 1983). In this case, the petitioner has not demonstrated the absence of a genuine issue of material fact and therefore has not met the burden for summary judgment. The Court will deny the petitioner’s motion without prejudice. The Court will review the issues raised by the petitioner in its consideration of the petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion for summary judgment [dkt. #74] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. s/David M. Lawson DAVID M. LAWSON United States District Judge Dated: November 22, 2011 PROOF OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on November 22, 2011. s/Deborah R. Tofil DEBORAH R. TOFIL -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?