Peake v. National City Bank of Michigan

Filing 90

ORDER Granting and Denying in Part Defendant's 86 MOTION to Bar Plaintiff's Claim for Damages, Withdrawing Defendant's 81 MOTION for Sanctions, and Denying Defendant's Oral Rule 50 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (Ware, L.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PHILIP PEAKE Plaintiff, Case No. 2:05-CV-72520 Judge Denise Page Hood v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF MICHIGAN, Defendant. / ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S ORAL RULE 50 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW AND GRANTING AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO BAR PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND WITHDRAWING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SANCTION This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Oral Rule 50 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, made October 15, 2008, during the above-captioned jury trial. This matter is also before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Bar Plaintiff's Claims for Damages after July 12, 2006 [Docket No. 86, filed Oct. 6, 2008]. This matter is also before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Sanctions [Docket No. 81, filed July 3, 2008]. For the reasons stated in the record on October 16, 2008, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Oral Rule 50 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Bar Plaintiff's Claim for Damages after July 12, 2006 [Docket No. 86, filed Oct. 6, 2008] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Defendant's Motion for Sanctions [Docket No. 81, filed July 3, 2008] is WITHDRAWN. S/Denise Page Hood Denise Page Hood United States District Judge Dated: October 24, 2008 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on October 24, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Lisa Ware for William F. Lewis Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?