Entertainment Software Association et al v. Granholm et al
Filing
51
ORDER regarding Defendants' Motion in opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendants' Cross Motion for Summary Judgment
49 Response to Motion filed by Jennifer M. Granholm, Michael A. Cox, Kym L. Worthy. Signed by Honorable George Caram Steeh. (MBea, )
Entertainment Software Association et al v. Granholm et al
Doc. 51
Case 2:05-cv-73634-GCS-SDP
Document 51
Filed 01/25/2006
Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 05-73634 vs. HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH JENNIFER GRANHOLM, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS' MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [DOCUMENT # 49] Defendants electronically filed their response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment combined with a cross-motion for summary judgment on January 23, 2006, document number 49. The court will not consider defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment as filed in combination with their response brief. Defendants can correct the record by filing a separate cross-motion for summary judgment that relies on the arguments contained in their response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. It is so ordered. s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: January 25, 2006 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record on January 25, 2006, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Josephine Chaffee Secretary/Deputy Clerk
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?