Flagg v. Detroit, City of et al

Filing 114

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re 106 MOTION to Quash Subpoena\Motion to Preclude Discovery of Electronic Communications from SkyTel Based Upon the Federal Stored Communications Act filed by Detroit, City of. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A - Contract Documents) (Crittendon, Krystal)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Ernest Flagg, K:\DOCS\LIT\CRITK\A37000\CAPT_BLK\KC5715.WPD 1 DEFENDANT CITY OF DETROIT' SUPPLEMENTAL s BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO PRECLUDE DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS FROM SKYTEL BASED UPON THE FEDERAL STORED COMMUNICATIONS ACT NOW COMES Defendant, CITY OF DETROIT, by and through its attorney, KRYSTAL A. CRITTENDON, and for its Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion to Preclude Discovery of Electronic Communications from SkyTel Based Upon the Federal Stored Communications Act, submits the following: Procedural History Plaintiff sought discovery of certain electronic communications or "text messages" from nonparty, Bell Industries, Inc, f/k/a SkyTel, Inc., via subpoena. On May 2, 2008, Defendant City of Detroit filed a Motion to Preclude Discovery of Electronic Communications from SkyTel Based Upon the Federal Stored Communications Act. In that Motion, Defendant City argued that the City of Detroit and Bell Industries, Inc, f/k/a SkyTel, Inc. entered into a contract, wherein SkyTel provided text message devices to the City of Detroit for use by certain City of Detroit employees, appointees, elected officials and agents. The contract between the City of Detroit and Bell Industries, Inc, f/k/a SkyTel, Inc. was not attached to Defendant City' Motion. s On May 6, 2008, this Honorable Court issued an Order Regarding Defendants'Motions to Preclude Discovery of Electronic Communications, in which the Court ordered that within fourteen (14) days of the entry of that order, Defendant City "to file with the Court and serve upon Plaintiff copies of any and all contracts between the City of Detroit and SkyTel covering the period from August 1, 2002 to September 1, 2007, pursuant to which SkyTel issued text messaging devices for use by City employees and provided text messaging services to the City and its employees." K:\DOCS\LIT\CRITK\A37000\CAPT_BLK\KC5715.WPD 2 After receipt of the Court' Order, defense counsel for the City of Detroit Law requested that the s City of Detroit Purchasing Department conduct another search of its records to attempt to locate any records or documents related to a contract between the City of Detroit and Bell Industries, Inc, f/k/a SkyTel, Inc. After an extensive search, the Purchasing Department located the attached documents related to the subject contract. (See Exhibit(s) A - Contract Documents). For the reasons articulated in Defendant City of Detroit' previously-filed Motion to Preclude Discovery of Electronic s Communications from SkyTel Based Upon the Federal Stored Communications Act, Defendant City submits that the Federal Stored Communication Act (the "SCA"), 18 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. precludes the production of the requested electronic communications in the instant civil litigation. WHEREFORE Defendant, CITY OF DETROIT, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court issue an Order, granting its Motion to Preclude Discovery of Electronic Communications from SkyTel Based Upon the Federal Stored Communications Act. Respectfully submitted, s/ Krystal A. Crittendon Assistant Corporation Counsel CITY OF DETROIT LAW 1650 First National Building Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 237-3018 critk@law.ci.detroit.mi.us. (P49981) DATED: May 16, 2008 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 16, 2008, after unsuccessfully seeking concurrence in the foregoing Supplemental Brief in Support of its Motion to Preclude Discovery of Electronic DEPARTMENT K:\DOCS\LIT\CRITK\A37000\CAPT_BLK\KC5715.WPD 3 Communications from SkyTel Based Upon the Federal Stored Communications Act, I electronically filed the foregoing paper with the Clerk of the Court using the ECT system, which will send notification of such filing to the following: Norman A. Yatooma (P54746) Robert S. Zawideh (P43787) 219 Elm Street Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 642-3600 nya@normanyatooma.com James C. Thomas (P23801) James C. Thomas, P.C. Attorney for Mayor Kwame M. Kilpatrick 535 Griswold, Suite 2632 Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 963-2420 jthomas@plunkettcooney.com Mayer Morganroth (P17966) Jeffrey B. Morganroth (P41670) 3000 Town Center, Suite 1500 Southfield, MI 48075 (2480 355-3084 jmorganroth@morganrothlaw.com Kenneth L. Lewis (P26071) Said A. Taleb (P66030) Randal M. Brown (P70031) Attorneys for Ella Bully- Cummings, Only 535 Griswold, Suite 2400 Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 983-4790 klewis@plunkettcooney.com Thomas G. Plunkett (P18957) David E. Plunkett (P66696) Attorneys for Non-Party Bell Industries, Inc., d/b/a SkyTel 380 N. Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 300 Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 642-0333 tgp@wwrplaw.com and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the paper to the following nonECF participants: N/A. Respectfully submitted, s/ Krystal A. Crittendon Assistant Corporation Counsel CITY OF DETROIT LAW 1650 First National Building Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 237-3018 critk@law.ci.detroit.mi.us. (P49981) DATED: May 16, 2008 4 DEPARTMENT K:\DOCS\LIT\CRITK\A37000\CAPT_BLK\KC5715.WPD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?