Flagg v. Detroit, City of et al
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Substitution of Attorney: Robert S. Zawideh for Ernest Flagg added. Attorney Delicia Coleman terminated. Signed by Honorable Gerald E Rosen. (LHac)
Flagg v. Detroit, City of et al
Doc. 29
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ERNEST FLAGG, NEXT OF FRIEND OF JONATHAN BOND, Case No. 05CV74253 Plaintiff Hon. Gerald Rosen vs. CITY OF DETROIT, a municipal corporation, DETROIT POLICE CHIEF ELLA BULLY CUMMINGS, DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF CARA BEST, JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS, ASSISTANT DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF HAROLD CURETON, COMMANDER CRAIG SCHARTZ, POLICE LT. BILLY JACKSON, jointly and severally, Defendants. / Norman Yatooma & Associates, P.C. By: Robert S. Zawideh (P43787) 219 Elm Street Birmingham, MI 48009 (248) 642-3600 Delicia Coleman, P-56278 Attorney for Plaintiff 21700 Northwestern Hyw., Ste. 980 Southfield, MI 48075 (248) 395-6292
NORMAN YATOOMA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
/ ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS At a hearing held in the Courthouse in the City of Detroit, County of Wayne and State of Michigan, on the 28th day of November, 2007. PRESENT: Gerald E. Rosen DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
This matter having come before the court by stipulation, and the court being otherwise fully informed in the premises,
1
Dockets.Justia.com
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the law offices of NORMAN YATOOMA & ASSOCIATES, P.C., ("NYA") are hereby substituted in as attorneys for Plaintiff, and the attorney Delicia Coleman is withdraw and otherwise removed as attorney for the Plaintiff. SO ORDERED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen Gerald E. Rosen United States District Judge Dated: November 28, 2007
NORMAN YATOOMA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on November 28, 2007, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?