Flagg v. Detroit, City of et al

Filing 34

ORDER granting 32 plaintiff's motion for leave to file second amended complaint. Signed by Honorable Gerald E Rosen. (LSau)

Download PDF
Flagg v. Detroit, City of et al Doc. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ERNEST FLAGG, as Next Friend of JONATHAN BOND, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 8, 2008 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen United States District Judge By motion filed on December 19, 2007, Plaintiff seeks leave to file a second amended complaint that includes additional allegations and reasserts claims against certain defendants who were dismissed from the case without prejudice in an order of partial dismissal dated November 14, 2007. The Court addressed this matter with counsel at a scheduling conference held on January 4, 2008. Having reviewed Plaintiff's motion and the record as a whole, and having considered the statements of counsel at the January 4 scheduling conference, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's December 19, Case No. 05-74253 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Dockets.Justia.com 2007 motion for leave to file second amended complaint is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within seven (7) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file and serve a second amended complaint of the form and substance found at Exhibit 1 to his motion. s/Gerald E. Rosen Gerald E. Rosen United States District Judge Dated: January 8, 2008 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on January 8, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?