3D Systems, Incorporated v. Envisiontec, Incorporated et al

Filing 282

AMENDED JUDGMENT re 279 Judgment Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)

3D Systems, Incorporated v. Envisiontec, Incorporated et al

Doc. 282

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 3D SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, -vsENVISIONTEC, INC., et al, Defendants. ________________________________/ AMENDED JUDGMENT I. Pursuant to the jury verdict in the form of answers to special questions entered on September 29, 2010, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that: 1. The accused Perfactory and Vanquish machines do not infringe claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 5,630,981. 2. The accused Vanquish machines infringe claim 2 of U.S. Patent No. 5,651,934. 3. The accused Vanquish machines do not infringe claim 81 U.S. Patent No. 5,902, 537. II. Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order Adopting Report and Recommendations of Special Master and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary 1 Case No. 05-74891 Hon: AVERN COHN

Dockets.Justia.com

Judgment of Infringement (Doc. 167), it is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Perfactory and Vanquish machines do not infringe claim 35 of U.S. Patent No. 4,999,143.

S/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 14, 2010 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, October 14, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Michael Williams Relief Case Manager, [phone]

2