3D Systems, Incorporated v. Envisiontec, Incorporated et al
FINAL JUDGMENT (Third Amended Judgment) Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
3D SYSTEMS, INC.,
Case No. 05-74891
Hon: AVERN COHN
ENVISIONTEC GMBH and
(THIRD AMENDED JUDGMENT)
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), the Court expressly determines that this judgment
is a final judgment; expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay in its entry;
and certifies this case for immediate appeal, all for the reasons stated in a memorandum
of even date.
Pursuant to the Memorandum And Order Granting Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion For
Judgment As A Matter Of Law And Denying Defendants’ Renewed Motion For Judgment
As A Matter Of Law (Doc. 294), it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
The accused Prefactory and Vanquish Machines infringe claim
11 of U.S. Patent No. 5,630,981.
The accused Vanquish Machine infringes claim 2 of U.S.
Patent No. 5,651,934.
The accused Vanquish Machine does not infringe claim 81 of
U.S. Patent No. 5,902,537.
Pursuant to the Memorandum And Order Adopting Report And Recommendations
Of Special Master And Granting In Part And Denying In Part Defendants’ Motion For
Summary Judgment Of Non-Infringement And Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment Of Infringement (Doc. 167), it is further ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the
Prefactory and Vanquish Machines do not infringe claim 35 of U.S. Patent No. 4,999,143.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 6, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record
on this date, October 6, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?