Wynn et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
118
ORDER denying 116 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
DEMARIA L. WYNN, as Guardian for DUANE L. WALLACE, a protected individual, Plaintiff, -vsSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. Case No. 06-10534 Hon: AVERN COHN
/ ORDER RECONSIDERING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES and ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES On June 08, 2009, the Court, without waiting for defendant to file a reply brief, denied (Dkt. 114) defendant's Motion For Attorney Fees Under M.C.L. § 500.3148(2) (Dkt. 110). Defendant has moved for reconsideration (Dkt. 116) on the grounds it was error to adjudicate the motion without giving defendant an opportunity to file a reply brief. Defendant is correct. The order denying attorney fees is VACATED. The Court has reconsidered the motion for attorney fees, taking into consideration the reply brief attached to the motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 116-3). The reply brief adds nothing to defendant's argument and does not change the Court's view that the motion for attorney fees should be denied. The Court finds no error
in the hours claimed for work done on the case or the hourly rates charged. As the Court stated in the vacated order, "Failure of proofs at trial to persuade a jury at trial is not the same as an absence of proofs." Defendant's position would lead to an award of attorney fees in every attendant care case in which a jury found against the claimant. The motion for attorney fees (Dkt. 110) is DENIED. SO ORDERED.
s/ Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 9, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, July 9, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?