Wynn et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
79
ORDER denying 72 Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses and for Failure to Comply with FRCP 26(a)(2). Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DEMARIA L. WYNN as Guardian for Duane L. Wallace, a protected individual, and DUANE L. WALLACE, a protected individual, Plaintiffs, -vsSTATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. / Case No. 06-10534 HON. AVERN COHN
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S EXPERT WITNESSES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FRCP 26(a)(2) (DOC. 72)1 This is an attendant care case under Michigan's No Fault Act. The jurisdiction of the Court is based on diversity. Defendant has filed a motion styled Motion in Limine to Strike Plaintiff's Expert Witnesses for Failure to Comply with FRCP 26 (a)(2) (doc. 72).
The Court reminds the parties that in the Sixth Circuit, a ruling on a motion in limine is advisory only. United States v. Yannott, 42 F.3d 999, 1007 (6th Cir. 1994). To preserve for appeal any issue relating to this decision, a party must raise the question at trial and obtain a final decision from the Court. See United States v. Luce, 713 F.2d 1236, 123940 (6th Cir. 1983).
1
For the reasons stated on the record at a hearing on March 30, 2009, the motion is DENIED. Plaintiff will provide a list of Laura Kling's deposition testimonies and her statement of compensation. Plaintiff produced Robert Ancell's deposition testimonies and his statement of compensation at the hearing. SO ORDERED. s/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 30, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, March 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?