Honsinger v. Burt

Filing 22

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation for 21 Report and Recommendation. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (THal)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WAYNE ROY HONSINGER, Petitioner, v. Case No. 06-cv-10720 JUDGE DENISE PAGE HOOD MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL J. KOMIVES SHIRLEE L. BURT Respondent. / ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives' Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 18], dated November 10, 2008. To date, none of the parties have filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has had an opportunity to review the Report and Recommendation and finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's determination that Petitioner is not entitled to habeas relief, as the state courts' resolution of Petitioner's claims did not result in a decision which was contrary to, or which involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Komives' Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 21, filed Nov. 10, 2008] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court's findings and conclusions of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus [Docket No. 1, filed Feb. 17, 2006] is DENIED. S/Denise Page Hood Denise Page Hood United States District Judge Dated: January 30, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and Wayne R. Honsinger, Reg. No. 134597, Muskegon Correctional Facility, 2400 S. Sheridan Rd., Muskegon, MI 49442 on January 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/William F. Lewis Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?