Jordan v. Caruso et al

Filing 47

OPINION and ORDER Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Granting Defendants' 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Dismissing the Case - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (FMos)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SIMONE JORDAN, Plaintiff, Case No. 06-cv-10979 v. Paul D. Borman United States District Judge PATRICIA CARUSO, et al., Paul Komives United States Magistrate Judge Defendants. _____________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. No. 45), (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 38), AND (3) DISMISSING THE CASE Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Paul Komives’ Report and Recommendation Regarding Defendant Pentrich and Murdock’s November 6, 2009 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No. 45). Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation on September 7, 2011. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. This Order closes the case. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Paul D. Borman____________ PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 28, 2011 I hereby certify that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record electronically and /or by U.S. Postal mail on September 28, 2011. S/Felicia Moses for Denise Goodine Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?