Jordan v. Caruso et al
Filing
47
OPINION and ORDER Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, Granting Defendants' 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Dismissing the Case - Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (FMos)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
SIMONE JORDAN,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 06-cv-10979
v.
Paul D. Borman
United States District Judge
PATRICIA CARUSO, et al.,
Paul Komives
United States Magistrate Judge
Defendants.
_____________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER (1) ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. No. 45), (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. No. 38), AND (3) DISMISSING THE CASE
Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Paul Komives’ Report and Recommendation Regarding
Defendant Pentrich and Murdock’s November 6, 2009 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Dkt. No.
45). Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation on September 7, 2011.
Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, and there being no timely objections
from either party under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and E.D. Mich L.R. 72.1(d), the Court ADOPTS the
Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, GRANTS Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment, and DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE.
This Order closes the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Paul D. Borman____________
PAUL D. BORMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: September 28, 2011
I hereby certify that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record electronically and
/or by U.S. Postal mail on September 28, 2011.
S/Felicia Moses for Denise Goodine
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?