Gjidoda v. Baker et al

Filing 2

ORDER Directing Service of 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Answer filed by Martin Gjidoda. Signed by Honorable Arthur J Tarnow. (NHoll, )

Download PDF
Gjidoda v. Baker et al Doc. 2 Case 2:06-cv-13654-AJT-WC Document 2 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARTIN GJIDODA, Petitioner, v. ROBIN BAKER, Field Office Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al Respondent. / ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE OF PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS AND ANSWER On August 17, 2006, Petitioner, Martin Gjidoda, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and request for Immediate Stay of Deportation. The Court has reviewed it and deems that it is not appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that: The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve photocopies of the petition and this order upon the United States Attorney via facsimile and first-class mail, and upon Respondent via first-class mail. Respondent shall file a response to this petition, along with relevant or supporting documentation, within five (5) days of the date of this order. Petitioner may reply in writing prior to the scheduled hearing. In order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction over this matter, it is ordered Case No. 06-13654 Honorable Arthur J. Tarnow United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-13654-AJT-WC Document 2 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 2 Diomande v. Wrona 05-73290 that Petitioner's removal or deportation is hereby stayed until further order of the Court. 28 U.S.C. § 1651. For good cause shown, the Government may move to vacate this stay. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Arthur J. Tarnow Arthur J. Tarnow United States District Judge Dated: August 18, 2006 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on August 18, 2006, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Catherine A. Pickles Judicial Secretary -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?