Cowan v. Stovall
Filing
58
ORDER Clarifying Response Deadline as to 57 MOTION to Stay :( Responses due by 8/29/2011) Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TRACY LYNN COWAN,
Petitioner,
v.
Case No. 06-13846
CLARICE STOVALL,
Respondent.
/
ORDER CLARIFYING RESPONSE DEADLINE
On August 19, 2011, the court entered an order inviting Respondent to file an
optional response addressing whether the petition should be stayed and held in
abeyance while Petitioner exhausts her claim in state court in view of the recent
decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. On the same day,
but after that order was entered, Petitioner filed a “Motion to Allow Petitioner to Return
to State Courts Seeking Exhaustion of New Claims by way of Motion for Relief from
Judgment Under MCR 6.500 and Hold Habeas Petition in Abeyance.” As the motion
presents the same issue as that advanced by the court’s order and the opinion of the
court of appeals, the court clarifies that any response, either to the court’s order or to
the motion, must be filed by August 29, 2011. In the absence of a response, the court
intends to grant the motion, and to “stay and abey” the petition.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: August 23, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, August 23, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C2 ORDERS\06-13846.COWAN.ClarifyResponseDeadline.jmp.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?