United States of America v. Boykin

Filing 29

ORDER Denying Request for Hearing (#21) Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 07-11483 HON. GEORGE CARAM STEEH vs. JULIA BOYKIN, Defendant and FEDEX CORPORATION Garnishee. __________________________________/ ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR HEARING Presently before the court is defendant’s request for hearing about the writ of garnishment directed at Fedex Corporation, filed on March 1, 2012. Plaintiff has filed a response, as well as a supplemental response to defendant’s pending motion, filed on March 5, 2012 and March 14, 2012 respectively. Plaintiff’s submissions demonstrate that defendant is not employed with Garnishee Fedex Corporation, therefore any objection defendant has with respect to the writ of garnishment directed at Fedex Corporation, such an objection is moot. Further, plaintiff attached the Certificate of Indebtedness to the complaint, and defendant has not presented any evidence to the contrary. Therefore, to the extent defendant’s request for a hearing -1- is a veiled motion to set aside the default judgment entered in this action, defendant’s bare allegation that she paid this debt years ago is insufficient to demonstrate good cause to set aside the default judgment in this matter. Accordingly, Defendant’s request for hearing [#21] is DENIED. SO ORDERED. s/George Caram Steeh GEORGE CARAM STEEH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: March 28, 2012 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on March 28, 2012 and also to Julia Boykin Walker at 2964 Cascade Dr., Ann Arbor, MI 48104, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Marcia Beauchemin Deputy Clerk -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?