Reuther v. Chapman et al
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 71 AND DISMISSING JOHN AND JANE DOE DEFENDANTS. Signed by District Judge Gerald E Rosen. (RBri)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT REUTHER, Plaintiff, vs. LONNIE CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ No. 07-CV-12249-DT Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING JOHN AND JANE DOE DEFENDANTS At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on April 28, 2009 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court This matter having come before the Court on the March 23, 2009 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's John and Jane Doe Defendants pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); and no timely objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation having been filed; and the Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the Court's file of this action and having concluded that, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the John and Jane Doe Defendants named in Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed; and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report
and Recommendation of March 23, 2009 [Dkt. # 71] be, and hereby is, adopted by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff's John and Jane Doe Defendants are hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice.
s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: April 28, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on April 28, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Ruth Brissaud Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?