Tran v. Michigan Department of Human Services et al

Filing 138

ORDER Adopting 137 Report and Recommendation granting 128 Motion to Dismiss filed by Michael Reizen and closing case. Signed by District Judge Bernard A Friedman. (CMul)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BEVERLY TRAN, Plaintiff, vs. HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FEBRUARY 6, 2009, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [DOCKET ENTRY 137] AND GRANTING DEFENDANT REIZEN'S MOTION TO DISMISS [DOCKET ENTRY 128] This matter is presently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated February 6, 2009. In her R&R, Magistrate Judge Majzoub recommends that Defendant Reizen's Motion to Dismiss be granted. Magistrate Judge Majzoub further recommends that the state law claims against this defendant be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R, and the time to do so has expired. The Court has had an opportunity to fully review this matter. The Court finds that Magistrate Judge Majzoub correctly and thoroughly analyzed all of the issues presented, and that she reached the proper conclusions for the proper reasons. The Court will therefore accept and adopt the Magistrate Judge's R&R as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Civil Action No. 07-CV-13232 1 IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Majzoub's R&R dated February 6, 2009, is accepted and adopted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Reizen's Motion to Dismiss [docket entry 128] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the state law claims filed against Defendant Reizen are dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). S/Bernard A. Friedman BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: February 27, 2009 Detroit, Michigan 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?