Hamilton et al v. Williamson et al

Filing 48

ORDER rejecting re 43 Objection, filed by James Hamilton, Draike Sparks, 44 Objection filed by James Hamilton, Draike Sparks. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES HAMILTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DONALD WILLIAMSON, et al., Defendants. ___________________________________ / ORDER REJECTING PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S APRIL 6, 2009 ORDERS Before the Court are Plaintiffs' April 20, 2009 objections to the Magistrate Judge's April 6, 2009 Orders, denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, (Doc. No. 41) and denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Add the Name of an Expert Witness, (Doc. No. 42). Defendants have responded to Plaintiffs' objections. (Doc. Nos. 45, 46). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), this Court reviews for clear error the portions of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation on a pre-trial non-dispositive motion to which a party has objected. Having carefully considered the entire record, the Court is convinced that the Magistrate Judge is correct in his analysis of the facts and the law in each Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Orders (Doc. Nos. 41, 42), (1) denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, and (2) denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Add the Name of an Expert Witness. 1 Case Number: 07-13401 JUDGE PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SO ORDERED. S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: July 30, 2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on July 30, 2009. S/Denise Goodine Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?