Horacek v. Wilson
Filing
100
ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation 98 denying 60 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Daniel Horacek, Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (PMil)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL HORACEK, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK WILSON, et al, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP). The case has been referred to a magistrate judge for pre-trial proceedings. Before the Court is plaintiff's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (MJRR) on plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Derrick Wilson. The magistrate judge recommends that the motion be denied without prejudice because Wilson has not been served with the notice of default and the U.S. Marshal's service is attempting to locate him and re-serve the notice of default.1 Plaintiff objects, contending that because Wilson has not answered the complaint, he does not need to be served with the notice of default. Plaintiff's objection is not welltaken. Wilson must be served with the notice of default before a proper default can be entered. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are
1
Case No. 07-13822 HONORABLE AVERN COHN
Apparently, Wilson's address has been sealed.
ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Wilson is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. SO ORDERED.
S/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: February 23, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Daniel Horacek 218347, 951 Indianwood Road, Lake Orion, MI 48362 and the attorneys of record on this date, February 23, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5160
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?