Horacek v. Wilson

Filing 94

ORDER Denying 93 Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Defendants' Ex Parte Motion for Extensionof Time to File a Response filed by Daniel Horacek. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL HORACEK, Plaintiff, v. DERRICK WILSON, et al, Defendants. ___________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP). The case has been referred to a magistrate judge for pre-trial proceedings. On January 13, 2009, the magistrate judge issued an order granting defendants' request for an extension of time in which to file a reply brief and permitting defendants to file a brief in excess of 5 pages. Defendants' reply is due January 28, 2009. Before the Court is plaintiff's objections to the order, contending that the magistrate judge failed to make a determination or good cause or excusable neglect. The objections are DENIED. The magistrate judge did not err in granting the extension. SO ORDERED. Case No. 07-13822 HONORABLE AVERN COHN Dated: January 21, 2009 s/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 07-13822 Horacek v. Wilson, et al CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed Daniel Horacek, 218347, 951 Indianwood Road, Lake Orion, MI 48362 and to the attorneys of record on this date, January 21, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?