Marshek v. Marske

Filing 21

ORDER Adopting 20 Report and Recommendation and Denying Defendant's 13 Motion to Dismiss without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TYSON MARSHEK, Plaintiff, v. MATTHEW MARSKE, Defendant. ______________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives' Report and Recommendation of December 18, 2008, sua sponte dismissing this case without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to keep the court informed of his address and dismissing Defendant's Motion to Dismiss without prejudice [d/e-13]. The court has reviewed the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed. The court finds that the law cited by the Magistrate has been correctly placed and is controlling in this matter. Therefore, the court will accept the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of December 18, 2008 as the findings and conclusions of this court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Komives' Report and Recommendation of December 18, 2008 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is Dismissed without prejudice and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 22, 2009 s/Anna Diggs Taylor ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 07-14407 Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 22, 2009. Tyson Marshek Linn County Jail P O Box 608 Cedar Rapids, IA 52406-0608 s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?