Cobbs v. Pramstaller et al

Filing 82

ORDER Adopting 77 Report and Recommendation that 66 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Haresh Pandya, George J Pramstaller, Gregory Naylor, Bonita Davis Neighbors, Marcella Clark, be GRANTED as to request for injunctive relief; DENIED in all other respects. 77 Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DALLAS COBBS, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE PRAMSTALLER, et al., Defendants. ______________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Charles Binder's Report and Recommendation of December 5, 2008, Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's request for injunctive relief only because it is now moot, and that the motion for summary judgment be denied in all other respects. The Court has reviewed the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Defendants' objections and Plaintiff's response. The Court finds that the law cited by the Magistrate has been correctly placed and is controlling in this matter. Therefore, the Court will accept the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of December 5, 2008 as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Binder's Report and Recommendation of December 5, 2008 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 12, 2009 s/Anna Diggs Taylor ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 07-14644 Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor Magistrate Judge Charles Binder CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 12, 2009. s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?