Alexander v. Macomb County et al
OPINION AND ORDER granting 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KENNETH ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, Case No. 07-14740 v. Honorable Patrick J. Duggan COUNTY OF MACOMB, MACOMB COUNTY JAIL, MACOMB COUNTY CORPORATION COUNSEL, MACOMB COUNTY CORPORATION, MARK HACKEL, BRENDA BAKER, TIM MOORE, HOPKINS, MARSKI, PARASACK, MARTINAZE, CLEMENTS, EREAUX, and JOHN DOE, Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. District Courthouse, Eastern District of Michigan, on February 3, 2009. PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PATRICK J. DUGGAN U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
Plaintiff, an inmate currently incarcerated in Macomb County Jail, initiated this lawsuit on November 5, 2007, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging numerous violations of his constitutional rights. On March 21, 2008, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment which this Court referred to Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan. On January 13, 2009, Magistrate Judge Morgan filed her Report and Recommendation (R&R) recommending that this Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment. At
the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Morgan advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within ten days of service upon them. (R&R at 18.) She further specifically advises the parties that "[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal." ( Id.) Neither party filed objections to the R&R. The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Morgan. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. A judgment consistent with this opinion shall issue.
s/PATRICK J. DUGGAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to:
Kenneth Alexander #269879 35 Adams Street Pontiac, MI 48342 Kenneth L. Lewis, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?