Weinstein v. UGS Corporation

Filing 151

ORDER dispensing with oral argument on certain motions in limine: re 74 MOTION in Limine No. 14 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 132, the Statement of Dennis Rahn filed by UGS Corporation, 71 MOTION in Limine No. 11 to Exclude Plaintiff's proposed Trial Exhibit 108, the Statement of Nabil Sater filed by UGS Corporation, 62 MOTION in Limine No. 2 To Exclude Testimony Concerning Tom Wellinger's Behavior At UGS Prior to May 3, 2005 filed by UGS Corporation, 66 MOTION in Limine No. 6 To Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed TrialExhibit 106, The Statement of Kevin Blevins filed by UGS Corporation, 77 MOTION in Limine No. 17 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 135, T estimony, Argument or Other Evidence Regarding an Anonymous Telephone Call Made on May 5, 2005 filed by UGS Corporation, 67 MOTION in Limine No. 9 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 111, the Statement of Matthew Gray file d by UGS Corporation, 73 MOTION in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 130, the Statement of Christ Tayon filed by UGS Corporation, 61 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Tom Wellinger's Drinking History< /I> filed by UGS Corporation, 65 MOTION in Limine No. 5 To Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 100, The Statement of Linda Barnes filed by UGS Corporation, 90 MOTION in Limine No. 3. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of G ary Weinstein Playing Golf and Writing a Book, After the Deaths of His Wife and Two Children filed by Gary Weinstein, 89 MOTION in Limine No. 2. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Gary Weinstein's Relationships with Women After the Death of His Wife filed by Gary Weinstein, 70 MOTION in Limine No. 10 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 103, the Statement of Thomas C. Obuchowski filed by UGS Corporation. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)

-RSW Weinstein v. UGS Corporation

Doc. 151

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GARY WEINSTEIN, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of JUDITH WEINSTEIN, as Representative of the Estate of ALEXANDER WEINSTEIN, and as Representative of the Estate of SAMUEL WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SIEMENS, fka UGS CORP., Defendant. _______________________________________/ ORDER DISPENSING WITH ORAL ARGUMENT ON CERTAIN MOTIONS IN LIMINE The Court originally scheduled each of the parties' motions in limine for hearing. Upon review of the parties' papers, however, the Court, pursuant to E.D. Mich. L.R. 7.1(f)(2), finds that oral argument is not necessary on Defendant's Motions in Limine Nos. 1 (Dkt. No. 61), 2 (Dkt. No. 62), 5 (Dkt. No. 65), 6 (Dkt. No. 66), 9 (Dkt. No. 67), 10 (Dkt. No. 70), 11 (Dkt. No. 71), 13 (Dkt. No. 73), 14 (Dkt. No. 74) and 17 (Dkt. No. 77) or on Plaintiff's Motions in Limine Nos. 2 (Dkt. No. 89) and 3 (Dkt. No. 90). The Court will hear argument as scheduled on November 18, 2010 on the remainder of the parties' motions in limine. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 16, 2010 Case No. 2:07-CV-15000 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge

1

Dockets.Justia.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on November 16, 2010. S/Denise Goodine Case Manager

2