Weinstein v. UGS Corporation
Filing 151
ORDER dispensing with oral argument on certain motions in limine: re 74 MOTION in Limine No. 14 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 132, the Statement of Dennis Rahn filed by UGS Corporation, 71 MOTION in Limine No. 11 to Exclude Plaintiff's proposed Trial Exhibit 108, the Statement of Nabil Sater filed by UGS Corporation, 62 MOTION in Limine No. 2 To Exclude Testimony Concerning Tom Wellinger's Behavior At UGS Prior to May 3, 2005 filed by UGS Corporation, 66 MOTION in Limine No. 6 To Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed TrialExhibit 106, The Statement of Kevin Blevins filed by UGS Corporation, 77 MOTION in Limine No. 17 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 135, T estimony, Argument or Other Evidence Regarding an Anonymous Telephone Call Made on May 5, 2005 filed by UGS Corporation, 67 MOTION in Limine No. 9 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 111, the Statement of Matthew Gray file d by UGS Corporation, 73 MOTION in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 130, the Statement of Christ Tayon filed by UGS Corporation, 61 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Tom Wellinger's Drinking History< /I> filed by UGS Corporation, 65 MOTION in Limine No. 5 To Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 100, The Statement of Linda Barnes filed by UGS Corporation, 90 MOTION in Limine No. 3. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of G ary Weinstein Playing Golf and Writing a Book, After the Deaths of His Wife and Two Children filed by Gary Weinstein, 89 MOTION in Limine No. 2. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Gary Weinstein's Relationships with Women After the Death of His Wife filed by Gary Weinstein, 70 MOTION in Limine No. 10 to Exclude Plaintiff's Proposed Trial Exhibit 103, the Statement of Thomas C. Obuchowski filed by UGS Corporation. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.