Weinstein v. UGS Corporation
ORDER DEFERRING RULING re 87 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Exclude any Evidence, Agruments or Testimony Regarding Plaintiffs Settlement with Tom Wellinger filed by Gary Weinstein, 90 MOTION in Limine No. 3. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evide nce of Gary Weinstein Playing Golf and Writing a Book, After the Deaths of His Wife and Two Children filed by Gary Weinstein, 89 MOTION in Limine No. 2. Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Gary Weinstein's Relationships with Women After the Death of His Wife filed by Gary Weinstein. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
-RSW Weinstein v. UGS Corporation
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GARY WEINSTEIN, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of JUDITH WEINSTEIN, as Representative of the Estate of ALEXANDER WEINSTEIN, and as Representative of the Estate of SAMUEL WEINSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 2:07-CV-15000 Paul D. Borman United States District Judge
SIEMENS, fka UGS CORP., Defendant. _______________________________________/ ORDER (1) DEFERRING RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE NO. 1 (DKT. NO. 87), NO. 2 (DKT. NO. 89) AND NO. 3 (DKT. NO. 90) AND (2) EXCLUDING FOR NOW TESTIMONY AND/OR MENTION AT TRIAL OF ALL FACTUAL ISSUES RAISED IN THOSE MOTIONS This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motions In Limine Nos. 1, 2 and 3 (Dkt. Nos. 87, 89 and 90). Siemens fka UGS Corp. ("Siemens") filed responses. (Dkt. Nos. 100, 101 and 102.) The Court held a hearing on November 18, 2010. The Court DEFERS ruling on Plaintiff's Motions in Limine Nos. 1, 2 and 3 (Dkt. Nos. 87, 89 and 90) and excludes for now testimony and/or mention at trial of all factual issues raised in those motions.
s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 22, 2010
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on November 22, 2010. s/Denise Goodine Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?