Reed v. Social Security, Commissioner of
ORDER Adopting 11 Report and Recommendation. Granting 9 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Social Security, Commissioner of, and Denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jon E Reed Signed by District Judge Gerald E Rosen. (LHac)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JON REED, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. _______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on March 30, 2009 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court
On September 19, 2008, Magistrate Judge Steven D. Pepe issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff Jon Reed's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff has not filed any objections to the R & R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties' underlying motions, and the record as a whole, the Court concurs in the thorough analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety. Accordingly,
Case No. 07-15275 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen Magistrate Judge Steven D. Pepe
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's September 19, 2008 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the R & R, Defendant's motion for summary judgment (docket #9) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket #8) is DENIED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: March 30, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on March 30, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/LaShawn R. Saulsberry Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?