Anderson v. Berghuis
Filing
25
ORDER Adopting 22 Report and Recommendation on Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (SJa)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT JARMEL ANDERSON,
Petitioner,
vs.
No. 08-CV-10515
Hon. Gerald E. Rosen
MARY K. BERGHUIS,
Respondent.
__________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON
PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
At a session of said Court, held in
the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan
on November 13, 2012
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
This matter having come before the Court on the August 31, 2012 Report and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Paul J. Komives recommending that the
Court deny Petitioner’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment; and no
timely objections to the R&R having been filed;1 and the Court having reviewed and
considered the Magistrate Judge’s R&R and the Court’s file of this matter and having
concluded that Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion should be denied, and being otherwise fully
advised in the premises,
1
Petitioner had requested -- and was granted -- an extension of time until October
5, 2012 to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R but as of this date, no objections
have been filed.
NOW, THEREFORE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s August 31, 2012 Report
and Recommendation [Dkt. # 212] is hereby ADOPTED by the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge,
Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment [Dkt. # 21] is DENIED.
s/Gerald E. Rosen
Chief Judge, United States District Court
Dated: November 13, 2012
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record
on November 13, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Shawntel Jackson for Ruth A. Gunther
Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?