Anderson v. Berghuis

Filing 25

ORDER Adopting 22 Report and Recommendation on Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment Signed by District Judge Gerald E. Rosen. (SJa)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT JARMEL ANDERSON, Petitioner, vs. No. 08-CV-10515 Hon. Gerald E. Rosen MARY K. BERGHUIS, Respondent. __________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on November 13, 2012 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court This matter having come before the Court on the August 31, 2012 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Paul J. Komives recommending that the Court deny Petitioner’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) Motion for Relief from Judgment; and no timely objections to the R&R having been filed;1 and the Court having reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge’s R&R and the Court’s file of this matter and having concluded that Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) motion should be denied, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, 1 Petitioner had requested -- and was granted -- an extension of time until October 5, 2012 to file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R but as of this date, no objections have been filed. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s August 31, 2012 Report and Recommendation [Dkt. # 212] is hereby ADOPTED by the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge, Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment [Dkt. # 21] is DENIED. s/Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court Dated: November 13, 2012 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on November 13, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Shawntel Jackson for Ruth A. Gunther Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?