Rideout v. United States Department of Justice et al

Filing 18

ORDER Adopting 17 Report and Recommendation and dismissing habeas petition as moot. Signed by District Judge Bernard A Friedman. (CMul)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MARC RIDEOUT, Petitioner, vs. C. EICHENLAUB, Respondent. ______________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS MOOT This matter is presently before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul Komives' Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated October 30, 2008. In his R&R, Magistrate Judge Komives recommends that Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus [docket entry 1] be dismissed as moot. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's R&R and the time to do so has expired. The Court has had the opportunity to fully review this matter. The Court finds that Magistrate Judge Komives correctly and thoroughly analyzed the issues presented and that he reached the proper conclusions for the proper reasons. Therefore, the Court will accept and adopt the Magistrate Judge's R&R as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, Civil Action No. 08-CV-10633 HON. BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Komives' R&R of October 30, 2008, is accepted and adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed as moot. S/Bernard A. Friedman____________ BERNARD A. FRIEDMAN CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: November 20, 2008 Detroit, Michigan I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record by electronic and/or first-class mail. S/Carol Mullins Case Manager to Chief Judge Friedman 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?