Fairley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Filing
22
ORDER Adopting 21 Report and Recommendation, and Granting 18 Motion to Dismiss filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Signed by District Judge John Feikens. (THal)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ANTOINETTE FAIRLEY, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I have before me, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation ("Report"). In his Report, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk recommends that I grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Neither party has filed objections to Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk's Report during the time set aside for doing so. If a party objects to specific portions of a report and recommendation within the allotted time, the Court should "make a de novo determination of those portions." 28 U.S.C. §636 (b)(1). If neither party objects to the report and recommendation in the time set aside for doing so, a district court need not review it by any standard. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), see also Lardie v. Birkett, 221 F.Supp.2d 806, 807 (E.D. Mich. 2002). A district court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the finding or recommendation made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I find that Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk has throughly and correctly analyzed the issues and I agree with his recommendation. For these reasons, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Civil No. 08-10924 Hon. John Feikens Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk
Hluchaniuk's Report and GRANT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: April 1, 2009 s/ John Feikens John Feikens United States District Judge
Proof of Service I hereby certify that the foregoing order was served on the attorneys/parties of record on April 1, 2009, by U.S. first class mail or electronic means. s/Carol Cohron Case Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?