Farnsworth v. Canadian National Railway

Filing 20

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Motion for Continuance, Extension of Discovery and New Scheduling Order. Signed by District Judge Patrick J Duggan. (MOre)

Download PDF
United States District Court For the Eastern District of Michigan Theodore Levin United States Courthouse 231 West Lafayette Boulevard, Room 867 Detroit, Michigan 48226-2708 Chambers of Patrick J. Duggan District Judge (313) 234-5145 FAX (313) 234-5353 December 9, 2008 To: Jeff Seely, Brian E. Jorde Joseph J. McDonell Re: Gentlemen: This letter confirms the telephone conference held on December 9, 2008 relating to plaintiff's request to extend the time for discovery. The Court's ruling is as follows: 1. 2. 3. Plaintiff may have until January 31, 2009 to complete discovery. Plaintiff may take the deposition of a 12(b)(6) representative. Plaintiff's counsel shall, within seven (7) days, notify defense counsel as to the area of inquiry that he believes the deposition of the 12(b)(6) representative will cover. Defense counsel shall make the 12(b)(6) representative available for deposition ­ hopefully, by January 15, 2009. Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment. Defendant may delay filing a reply to plaintiff's response until ten (10) days after the deposition of the 12(b)(6) representative has been taken. Final Pretrial in this case is rescheduled to: Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 2:00 p.m. Thomas J. Farnsworth v. Grand Trust Western Railroad, Inc. Case No. 08-11081 4. 5. 6. Jeff Seely Joseph J. McDonell December 9, 2008 Page Two. ___________________________ The Court encourages counsel to move quickly to take the deposition so that defense counsel may file the reply giving the Court adequate time to rule on the motion for summary judgment before the pretrial date. Sincerely, s/Patrick J. Duggan United States District Judge PJD/eac

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?