RDI of Michigan, LLC v. Michigan Coin-Op Vending, Incorporated et al

Filing 59

ORDER granting 39 Motion for Leave to File; granting 42 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Neil S. Rockind terminated; granting 43 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 9 Motion for Order. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (MVer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION RDI OF MICHIGAN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN COIN-OP VENDING, INC, JORDAN MIRCH, and DOES I-V and ROES VI-IX, Defendants. / ORDER In reviewing the docket in this case, the Court finds that several motions have not been addressed directly in writing (although some were ruled upon in open court and another was implicitly addressed by a written order of the Court). Accordingly, for administrative purposes, the Court hereby ORDERS that: 1. 2. Defendants' Motion for Order to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order (Docket #9) is DENIED, as the Court ruled at the hearing held on March 27, 2008. Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Response to Order to Show Cause Instanter (Docket #39) is GRANTED, as implicitly recognized in the Court's dismissal of the underlying Order to Show Cause. The Motion for Withdrawal of Attorney Neil Rockind (Docket #42) as attorney for Defendants is GRANTED, as the Court ruled at the hearing held on October 14, 2008. The Motion to Amend/Correct Motion for Leave to File and Serve First Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Michigan Coin-Op Vending, Inc. (Docket #43) is GRANTED, for the reasons set forth therein. Case No. 08-11177 Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff 3. 4. IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN U.S. District Judge in the absence of LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF U.S. District Judge Dated: January 26, 2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of record by electronic or U.S. mail on January 26, 2009. s/Marie E. Verlinde Case Manager (810) 984-3290

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?