RDI of Michigan, LLC v. Michigan Coin-Op Vending, Incorporated et al
Filing
91
ORDER denying 88 Sealed Motion; denying 89 Sealed Motion. Signed by District Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff. (MVer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
RDI OF MICHIGAN, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 08-11177
Hon. Lawrence P. Zatkoff
MICHIGAN COIN-OP VENDING, INC,
JORDAN MIRCH, and DOES I-V
and ROES VI-IX,
Defendants.
___________________________________________/
OPINION AND ORDER
AT A SESSION of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse,
in the City of Port Huron, State of Michigan,
on the 26TH day of October, 2011
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On October 20, 2011, Plaintiff filed two motions under seal (Docket #s 88 and 89). Both
motions, generally speaking, address the judgment entered by this Court in this case, as well as the
consent judgment entered into between Plaintiff and Defendant Jordan Mirch (“Mirch”) in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
The Court notes that this case was closed on February 18, 2010, i.e., over 19 months ago,
when the Court entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Mirch. The motions now pending
before the Court: (1) are untimely; (2) do not seek to amend the judgment entered by the Court, and
(3) otherwise request relief that this Court declines to grant.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above and without going into greater detail due to the
fact that Plaintiff filed the motions under seal, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motions filed as Docket
#s 88 and 89.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Lawrence P. Zatkoff
LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: October 26, 2011
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of
record by electronic or U.S. mail on October 26, 2011.
s/Marie E. Verlinde
Case Manager
(810) 984-3290
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?