Missouri v. Birkett

Filing 31

ORDER denying as Moot 30 Motion to Forward the Record on Appeal. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DARNELL MISSOURI, # 389199, Petitioner, v. Case Number: 08-CV-11660 THOMAS BIRKETT, Respondent. / ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO FORWARD THE RECORD ON APPEAL AS MOOT Pending before the court is Petitioner Darnell Missouri’s “Motion to Forward the Record on Appeal,” filed on March 25, 2011. (Dkt. # 30.) On October 29, 2009, the court denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and declined to issue him a certificate of appealability. (Dkt. # 18.) Petitioner has filed an appeal from the court’s decision and is requesting that the court forward his record to the Untied States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. However, the Sixth Circuit has access to his records through the court’s internal docketing system. The court therefore denies Petitioner’s motion as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s “Motion to Forward the Record on Appeal” [Dkt. # 30] is DENIED as moot. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 20, 2011 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, April 20, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Lisa G. Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522 S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\08-11660.MISSOURI.Deny.Motion.Moot.03.31.11.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?