Missouri v. Birkett
Filing
31
ORDER denying as Moot 30 Motion to Forward the Record on Appeal. Signed by District Judge Robert H. Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DARNELL MISSOURI, # 389199,
Petitioner,
v.
Case Number: 08-CV-11660
THOMAS BIRKETT,
Respondent.
/
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S
MOTION TO FORWARD THE RECORD ON APPEAL AS MOOT
Pending before the court is Petitioner Darnell Missouri’s “Motion to Forward the
Record on Appeal,” filed on March 25, 2011. (Dkt. # 30.) On October 29, 2009, the
court denied Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and declined to issue him a
certificate of appealability. (Dkt. # 18.) Petitioner has filed an appeal from the court’s
decision and is requesting that the court forward his record to the Untied States Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. However, the Sixth Circuit has access to his records
through the court’s internal docketing system. The court therefore denies Petitioner’s
motion as moot.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s “Motion to Forward the Record on
Appeal” [Dkt. # 30] is DENIED as moot.
s/Robert H. Cleland
ROBERT H. CLELAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 20, 2011
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record
on this date, April 20, 2011, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa G. Wagner
Case Manager and Deputy Clerk
(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C3 ORDERS\08-11660.MISSOURI.Deny.Motion.Moot.03.31.11.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?