Tinker v. Social Security, Commissioner of
Filing
19
Stricken- ORDER granting 8 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 15 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 17 Report and Recommendation Reversing the decision of the Secretary. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for a determination of SSI benefits due. Signed by District Judge Nancy G Edmunds. (CHem) Modified on 9/22/2009 (CHem).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION James W. Tinker, Plaintiff, v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ________________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This matter has come before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Being fully advised in the premises and having reviewed the record and the pleadings, including Defendant's Objections if any, the Court finds that the Magistrate Judge reached the correct conclusion in the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court hereby ACCEPTS AND ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. It is further ordered that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED, and the decision of the Secretary is REVERSED. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is hereby REMANDED to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for a determination of SSI benefits due. SO ORDERED. s/Nancy G. Edmunds Nancy G. Edmunds United States District Judge Dated: September 22, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on September 22, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Carol A. Hemeyer Case Manager Case No. 08-11675 Hon. Nancy G. Edmunds
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?