Rogers v Harry

Filing 6

ORDER Requiring Respondent to File a Response and the State Court Record re 5 Response to Motion filed by Brian Rogers. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (JOwe)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRIAN ROGERS, Petitioner, v. SHIRLEE HARRY, Respondent. / ORDER REQUIRING RESPONDENT TO FILE A RESPONSE AND THE STATE COURT RECORD This is a habeas case brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On November 3, 2008, Respondent filed a motion for summary judgment contending that the habeas petition should be dismissed for failure to comply with the applicable one-year statute of limitations set forth at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Petitioner filed a reply to the motion on November 17, 2008 making arguments for tolling due to newly-discovered evidence and actual innocence. Having reviewed the pleadings, the Court finds that a response to Petitioner's reply would assist the Court in ruling on the summary judgment motion. The Court also finds that the state court record is necessary for the proper resolution of this case. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Respondent to file a response to Petitioner's reply, as well as the state court record, within 21 days of the filing date of this order. CASE NO. 2:08-CV-11746 HONORABLE AVERN COHN Dated: November 25, 2008 s/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 08-11746 Rogers v. Harry CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Brian Rogers, 200686, Muskegon Correctional Facility, 2400 S. Sheridan, Muskegon, MI 49442 and the attorneys of record on this date, November 25, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?