Detroit Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds v. Howard Pingston Company et al
Filing
101
ORDER granting 99 Motion for Substituted Service of amended order for examination of judgment debtor and restraining transfer of certain property supplementary to judgment. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (MBea)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
TRUSTEES OF THE DETROIT
CARPENTERS FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS,
Case No. 08-11856
Hon. George Caram Steeh
Mag. Judge Steven D. Pepe
Plaintiffs,
v
HOWARD PINGSTON COMPANY, a
Michigan corporation, and HOWARD
PINGSTON, an individual,
Defendants.
/
ORDER AUTHORIZING SUBSTITUTED SERVICE OF AMENDED ORDER
FOR EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR AND RESTRAINING
TRANSFER OF CERTAIN PROPERTY SUPPLEMENTARY TO JUDGMENT
THIS MATTER having come on to be heard upon the Ex-Parte Motion for
Substituted Service of Amended Order for Examination of Judgment Debtor and
Restraining Transfer of Certain Property Supplementary to Judgment, and the
Court having reviewed the same and finding good cause for the entry of this Order
pursuant to Federal Rule 4(e)(1), and MCR 2.105(l), and being otherwise fully
advised in the premises,
NOW THEREFORE,
IT IS ORDERED that this Court’s Amended Order for Examination of
Judgment Debtor and Restraining Transfer of Certain Property Supplementary to
Judgment requiring the appearance of Howard Pingston at the offices of Erman,
Teicher, Zucker & Freedman, P.C., 400 Galleria Officentre, Suite 444, Southfield,
Michigan 48034, may be served upon Howard Pingston by firmly affixing a copy
of said Order to the premises at 23258 Oak St., Dearborn, Michigan 48128, and by
forwarding copies of same to said address, certified mail, return receipt requested,
and first class mail, in plain white envelopes with no return address.
DATED: July 25, 2016
s/George Caram Steeh
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?