Spencer v. Ludwig

Filing 41

ORDER Adopting 32 Report and Recommendation Denying Petitioner's 1 Habeas Application and 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLAM SIM SPENCER, #384851, Petitioner, v. DAVID PRATT, Respondent. ______________________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (D/E-32) This matter is before the court on Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives's Report and Recommendation of July 30, 2009, recommending that Petitioner's Habeas Application and Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. The court has reviewed the file, Petitioner's Objection, Petitioner's Motion to take Judicial Notice of Revised Statement of Facts and Procedural History and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Respondent did not file an Objection. The court finds that the law cited by the Magistrate has been correctly placed and is controlling in this matter. THEREFORE, the court will accept the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of July 30, 2009, as the findings and conclusions of this court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Komives's Report and Recommendation of July 30, 2009, is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Habeas Application (D/E-1) and Motion for Summary Judgment (D/E-20) are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: December 11, 2009 s/Anna Diggs Taylor ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 08-12327 Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on December 11, 2009. William Spencer, #384851 Pugsley Correctional Facility 7401 E. Walton Rd Kingsley, MI 49649 s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?