Sullivan v. Detroit Police Department, et al
Filing
53
ORDER denying 47 Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Robert H Cleland. (LWag)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
JOHN L. SULLIVAN, JR., Plaintiff, v. DETROIT POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. / ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S "MOTION FOR REHEARING AND RECONSIDERATION" Pending before the court is Plaintiff's "Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration," seeking to have the court review two specific aspects of its June 17, 2009 "Order Granting in Part . . . Plaintiff's Motion in Limine." Specifically, Plaintiff argues the court should reconsider allowing Defendants to call any witnesses, as Defendants did not file a witness list. (Pl.'s Mot. at 4.) Plaintiff also seeks to have the court reconsider withholding ruling on the admissibility of evidence of a domestic dispute until trial. (Id. at 3, 5.) On June 22, 2009, the court discussed the pending motion with counsel for all parties on the record. The court clarified that, while no reconsideration of its ruling was required, because of Defendants' failure to file a timely witness list Defendants would only be allowed to call parties as witnesses, to include Douglas Gross. As to Plaintiff's second argument, the court was not persuaded that Plaintiff demonstrated a a palpable defect by which the court and the parties had been misled, and thus denied that portion of Plaintiff's motion. E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3). Accordingly, Case No. 08-CV-12731
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Motion for Rehearing and Reconsideration" [Dkt. # 47] is DENIED. s/Robert H. Cleland ROBERT H. CLELAND UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: June 24, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, June 24, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
s/Lisa G. Wagner Case Manager and Deputy Clerk (313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\08-12731.SULLIVAN.Deny.Pl.Mot.Reconsid.eew.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?