Taylor et al v. Countrywide Home Loans et al

Filing 37

ORDER Adopting Report and Recommendation dismissing as moot 5 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Countrywide Home Loans, America's Wholesale Lender. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL TAYLOR, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL CASE NO. 08-13258 v. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Before the Court are the defendants' motion to dismiss and the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michael Hluchaniuk, United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny the defendants' motion to dismiss as moot. The Magistrate Judge served the Report and Recommendation on all parties on September 30, 2008 and notified the parties that any objections must be filed within ten days of service. Accordingly, any objections should have been filed by approximately October 17, 2008. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6; E.D. Mich. L.R. 6.1. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequently, the Court does not need to conduct a review and will accept and adopt the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [docket entry #18] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss [docket entry #5] HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III is DENIED AS MOOT. SO ORDERED. s/Stephen J. Murphy, III Stephen J. Murphy, III United States District Judge Dated: November 18, 2008 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on November 18, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Alissa Greer Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?