Taylor et al v. Countrywide Home Loans et al

Filing 45

ORDER Adopting 38 Report and Recommendation for 27 Motion for Default Judgment filed by Diane Taylor, Daniel Taylor Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL TAYLOR and DIANE TAYLOR, Plaintiffs, v. HONORABLE STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, AMERICA'S WHOLESALE LENDER, and RANDALL S. MILLER AND ASSOCIATES, PC Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS' AMENDED MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Docket no. 27) Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michael Hluchaniuk, United States Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny the plaintiffs' motion for default judgment. The Magistrate Judge served the Report and Recommendation on all parties on November 21st , 2008 and notified the parties that any objections must be filed within ten days of service. Accordingly, any objections should have been filed by approximately December 8th, 2008. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6; E.D. Mich. L.R. 6.1. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequently, the Court does not need to conduct a review and will accept and adopt the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER CIVIL CASE NO. 08-13258 ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED. SO ORDERED. s/Stephen J. Murphy, III STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III United States District Judge Dated: December 18, 2008 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on December 18, 2008, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/Alissa Greer Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?