Billstein et al v. Goodman et al

Filing 223

ORDER granting 206 Motion for Clarification of Magistrate Judge's Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen. (GWil)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT BILLSTEIN, SR., et.al., Plaintiffs, v. MARK GOODMAN, et.al., Defendants. / ORDER Defendants' Motion for Clarification [Docket #206] is hereby GRANTED. This Court's order of May 18, 2010 [Docket #190] is modified and clarified as follows: On page 1, line 4, "The motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiffs shall use as an expert...," which contains a typographical omission of the word "not," is changed to "The motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiffs shall not use as an expert...." In addition, as explained in a telephonic conference with counsel for the parties, the fact that Mr. Suppes, Mr. Barnes, or any other witness might have a consulting contract with any customer or competitor of any of the Defendants or Plaintiffs, or might work within the industry as a consultant, does not require that they be stricken as witnesses, as long as they are not otherwise employees, contractors, customers, shareholders, or sales representatives of the Plaintiffs, Defendants or their competitors. SO ORDERED. No. 08-13415 District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen S/R. Steven Whalen R. STEVEN WHALEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: June 14, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served on the attorneys and/or parties of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on June 14, 2010. S/Gina Wilson Judicial Assistant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?