Tait v. Clarkston State Bank et al

Filing 32

ORDER denying 31 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JAMES MARK TAIT, Plaintiff, vs. HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN CAPITOL CITY TITLE AGENCY, Defendant. _______________________________/ JAMES MARK TAIT, Plaintiff, vs. HONORABLE PAUL D. BORMAN CLARKSTON STATE BANK, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION On August 31, 2009, the Court issued an order dismissing these matters for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). On September 11, 2009, Plaintiff James Mark Tait ("Tait") filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court's order. Motions for reconsideration are governed by E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(g)(3), which states, in relevant part, that a party moving for reconsideration must "not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case." Civil Action No. 08-CV-14411 Civil Action No. 08-CV-14191

Tait's motion for reconsideration does not demonstrate a palpable defect. Accordingly, Tait

has not shown that he is entitled to the relief sought. His motion is therefore denied. SO ORDERED.

S/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 29, 2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on September 29, 2009. S/Denise Goodine Case Manager

2