Washington-Wheeler v. Social Security, Commissioner

Filing 30

ORDER Adopting 26 Report and Recommendation Granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security and Denying 19 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Brenda Washington-Wheeler. Signed by District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. (JCur)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRENDA WASHINGTON-WHEELER, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ______________________________________/ Case No. 08-14960 Hon. Anna Diggs Taylor Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Docket Entry 26) This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon's Report and Recommendation of December 23, 2009, granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #23) and denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #19). The Court has reviewed the file, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Plaintiff's objections. The Court finds that the law cited by the Magistrate has been correctly placed and is controlling in this matter. Therefore, the Court will accept the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation of December 23, 2009 as the findings and conclusions of this Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Randon's Report and Recommendation of December 23, 2009 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 26, 2010 s/Anna Diggs Taylor ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Order was served upon counsel of record via the Court's ECF System to their respective email addresses or First Class U.S. mail disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on January 26, 2010. s/Johnetta M. Curry-Williams Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?