Ragland v. Raby

Filing 109

ORDER Construing 108 Plaintiff's Appeal as a Motion for Reconsideration and Referring Same to Magistrate Judge for Further Proceedings. Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (SJa)

-MAR Ragland v. Raby

Doc. 109

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

KEVIN DARNELL RAGLAND, Plaintiff, v. M. RABY, KEITH BERBICK, KEVIN KERR, NICOLAS SMISSICK, DANIEL ROSE, ANDREW BELANGER, BRIAN BOLASH, and ANTHONY CARIGNAN, Defendants. ___________________________________/ Case No. 08-15253 HONORABLE AVERN COHN

ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL AS A MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND REFERRING SAME TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for all pretrial proceedings. Defendants filed a Motion to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum (Doc. No. 96). Plaintiff did not file a response. Accordingly, the magistrate judge issued an order granting the motion (Doc. No. 106). Before the Court is "Plaintiff's Appeal to Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon's Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Quash" in which he says he did not receive a copy of defendants' motion. Plaintiff also says that although he notified the court of his new address (JCF), he is still receiving mail from the court sent to his old address (FCI in St. Louis).

Dockets.Justia.com

In light of this, the Court construes plaintiff's paper as a motion for reconsideration and refers the same to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. SO ORDERED. S/Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: September 13, 2010 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Kevin Ragland #191565, St. Louis Correctional Facility, 8585 N. Croswell Road, St. Louis, MI 48880, and the attorneys of record on this date, September 13, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Shawntel Jackson Relief Case Manager, [phone]

2