Norman v. Cummings et al
Filing
64
ORDER Affirming re 54 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by District Judge Marianne O Battani. (BThe)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NORMAN DORISE, Plaintiff, v. ELLA BULLEA CUMMINGS, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ ORDER AFFIRMING JANUARY 29, 2010 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT Before the Court are Plaintiff Norman Dorise's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's order denying his request for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 55). The Court has reviewed the pleadings and finds oral argument will not aid in the resolution of this motion. See E. D. Mich. LR 7.1(e)(2). For the reasons that follow, the Court AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's order. According to Plaintiff, he complied with the Magistrate Judge's earlier order to file his amended complaint no later than February 2, 2010. He filed his complaint on January 25, 2010. The Court agrees that the amended complaint was filed in compliance with the order. The confusion arises because when Plaintiff submitted his amended complaint, he also included a second motion for leave to file an amended complaint. That motion merely duplicates the motion previously granted. See Doc. Nos. 46, 52. Consequently, the Magistrate Judge denied the motion as moot. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) the Court may "reconsider any pretrial matter under this subparagraph (A) where it has been shown that the magistrate's order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Case No. 09-10042 HON. MARIANNE O. BATTANI
Despite Plaintiff's Objection, it is clear that Plaintiff's "second" request to amend his complaint is identical to his first motion seeking leave to amend his complaint. Therefore, his second motion is moot. In sum, the Amended Complaint, filed January 25, 2010, is the operative pleading. IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Marianne O. Battani MARIANNE O. BATTANI UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: March 19, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served upon Plaintiff and counsel of record on this date by ordinary mail and/or electronic filing. s/Bernadette M. Thebolt Case Manager
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?