Kaplan v. Experian Information Solutions, Incorporated et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting 43 Motion to Stay Briefing and Consideration on 37 MOTION for Summary Judgment Establishing Liability Against Defendant, Trans Union, Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P Rule 56(d)(2) by Darryl B Kaplan. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Darryl B. Kaplan, Plaintiff, v. Experian, Incorporated, et al., Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT TRANS UNION, LLC'S MOTION TO STAY BRIEFING AND CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO TRANS UNION Currently before the Court is a Motion to Stay Briefing and Consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss, filed by Defendant Trans Union, LLC ("Trans Union) (Docket Entry No. 43). In that motion, Trans Union asks the Court to stay briefing on, and consideration of, Plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment as to his claims against Trans Union (Docket Entry No. 37). Having considered the motion, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that further briefing on, and consideration of, Docket Entry No. 37 is STAYED until further order of this Court. This Order does not stay briefing on, or consideration of, any other motions. This Order does not stay discovery in this action. Case No. 09-10047 Honorable Sean F. Cox IT IS SO ORDERED. S/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge Dated: October 23, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on October 23, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. S/Jennifer Hernandez Case Manager

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?