Carico v. Woods

Filing 13

ORDER denying 12 Motion for Immediate Consideration of Petition. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DTof)

Download PDF
Carico v. Woods Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT P. CARICO, Petitioner, CASE NO. 09-10124 v. JEFFREY WOODS, Respondent. _________________________________/ ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE CONSIDERATION On January 12, 2009, petitioner Robert P. Carico filed a pro se habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The pleading challenges Petitioner's conviction and sentence of two to five years for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Petitioner contends that he was sentenced on the basis of inaccurate information and convictions for which he was not represented by counsel. On July 27, 2009, respondent Jeffrey Woods filed an answer to the petition, and on September 24, 2009, Petitioner filed a reply. Currently pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion for immediate consideration of his habeas petition. Petitioner alleges that, if granted relief, his sentence will be reduced, and he will suffer less social stigma, prejudice, and discrimination. The Court is unable to give immediate consideration to Petitioner's case due to older habeas petitions pending on its docket. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for immediate consideration [Dkt. #12] is DENIED. The Court nevertheless will attempt to address the merits PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com of Petitioner's habeas claims within the next ninety days. s/Paul D. Borman PAUL D. BORMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 7, 2010 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Copies of this Order were served on the attorneys of record by electronic means or U.S. Mail on October 7, 2010. s/Denise Goodine Case Manager 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?