Newson v. Steele et al

Filing 96

ORDER Adopting 85 Report and Recommendation and Denying 26 Motion for TRO and for Order to Show Cause filed by Maurice Newson Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (NHol)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MAURICE NEWSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN T. STEELE, et al., Defendants. ______________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FORA TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE This is a prisoner civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, claims that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs and retaliated against him for filing grievances. The matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pre-trial proceedings. Plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and for an order to show cause. The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation (MJRR) recommending that the motion be denied. Neither party has filed objections to the MJRR and the time for filing objections has passed. Having reviewed the MJRR, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge that plaintiff is not entitled to a TRO or an order to show cause. Accordingly, the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are adopted as the findings and conclusions of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for a TRO and for an order to show cause is DENIED. SO ORDERED. Case Number: 09-10346 HONORABLE AVERN COHN December 08, 2009 s/ Avern Cohn AVERN COHN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 09-10346 Newson v. Steele, et al Order Adopting Report & Recommendation re: TRO, etc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to Maurice Newson, 370171, G. Robert Cotton Correctional Facility, 3500 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201 and the attorneys of record on this date, December 8, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail. s/ Julie Owens Case Manager, (313) 234-5160 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?