Dassault Systemes,SA v. Childress
Filing
672
POST-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DASSAULT SYSTÈMES, S.A.,
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,
Case No. 09-cv-10534
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
v.
KEITH CHILDRESS, d/b/a
PRACTICAL CATIA,
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.
__________________________________________________________________
POST-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
__________________________________________________________________
Pursuant to the Court’s request at the April 4, 2024, Status Conference,
Plaintiff
Dassault
Systemes
S.A.
(“Plainitiff”
or
“Dassault”)
and
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Keith Childress (“Childress”), by and through their
respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following schedule for posttrial motions.
May 15, 2024:
Childress will file any motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 50 and/or 59; and
Dassault will file any motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant
to 17 U.S.C. 505.
June 12, 2024:
Childress will file his Response Brief to Dassault’s
motion for attorneys’ fees; and
Dassault will file its Response Brief to Childress’
motion(s) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 and/or 59.
1
June 26, 2024:
Childress and Dassault will file their respective reply
briefs.
The Court will set a day/time for a hearing on the Parties’ respective posttrial motions, including Dassault’s renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of
Law Regarding Childress’ Trademark Fair Use Defense [Dkt. 633], as already
briefed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Matthew F. Leitman
MATTHEW F. LEITMAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: April 18, 2024
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties
and/or counsel of record on April 18, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary
mail.
s/Holly A. Ryan
Case Manager
(313) 234-5126
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?