Dassault Systemes,SA v. Childress

Filing 672

POST-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DASSAULT SYSTÈMES, S.A., Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Case No. 09-cv-10534 Hon. Matthew F. Leitman v. KEITH CHILDRESS, d/b/a PRACTICAL CATIA, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. __________________________________________________________________ POST-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER __________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to the Court’s request at the April 4, 2024, Status Conference, Plaintiff Dassault Systemes S.A. (“Plainitiff” or “Dassault”) and Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Keith Childress (“Childress”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following schedule for posttrial motions. May 15, 2024: Childress will file any motions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 and/or 59; and Dassault will file any motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 505. June 12, 2024: Childress will file his Response Brief to Dassault’s motion for attorneys’ fees; and Dassault will file its Response Brief to Childress’ motion(s) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50 and/or 59. 1 June 26, 2024: Childress and Dassault will file their respective reply briefs. The Court will set a day/time for a hearing on the Parties’ respective posttrial motions, including Dassault’s renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Regarding Childress’ Trademark Fair Use Defense [Dkt. 633], as already briefed. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Matthew F. Leitman MATTHEW F. LEITMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: April 18, 2024 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on April 18, 2024, by electronic means and/or ordinary mail. s/Holly A. Ryan Case Manager (313) 234-5126 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?